Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3409 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 285 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$148
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $148 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |