Celeron G1620 vs Core Ultra 9 285K
The Celeron G1620 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FPS Comparison Across Popular Games
Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.
Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.
Base Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 285K has a 37% higher base clock.
LGA1155
Sockethelp
LGA1851Ivy Bridge
Codenamehelp
Arrow Lake-SDesktop
Segmenthelp
DesktopIntel HD
Integrated GPUhelp
Arc Graphics 4 Xe LPGDDR3
RAMhelp
6400 MHz (DDR5)Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
OverclockableFrequently Asked Questions
compare_arrowsWhich is better, Celeron G1620 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 48% faster than the Celeron G1620 on average across 100+ games, scoring 71/100 vs 48/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than Celeron G1620?expand_more
48% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Celeron G1620 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 71/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Celeron G1620 and Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
Performance: Celeron G1620 scores 48/100, Core Ultra 9 285K scores 71/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Celeron G1620 or Core Ultra 9 285K bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Celeron G1620 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 71/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.
Popular Comparisons
Celeron G1620 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DCeleron G1620 vs Ryzen 5 7600XCeleron G1620 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3DCeleron G1620 vs Ryzen 7 7700XCeleron G1620 vs Ryzen 9 9900XCeleron G1620 vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DCeleron G1620 vs Ryzen 7 9700XCeleron G1620 vs Ryzen 5 8500GCeleron G1620 vs Ultra 7 265KFCeleron G1620 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3DCeleron G1620 vs i3-12100FCeleron G1620 vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DCeleron G1610 vs Celeron G1620Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron G1620Celeron G1620 vs Ryzen 7 9800X3DCeleron G1620 vs Pentium E5400Celeron G1620 vs Ultra 5 245KCeleron G1620 vs Ultra 5 245KFUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7600XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9950X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7700XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9900XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9700XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 8500GUltra 7 265KF vs Ultra 9 285KUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9900X3Di3-12100F vs Ultra 9 285KUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DCeleron G1610 vs Ultra 9 285KAthlon II X2 240 vs Ultra 9 285KUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9800X3DUltra 9 285K vs Pentium E5400Ultra 5 245K vs Ultra 9 285KUltra 5 245KF vs Ultra 9 285K