Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5500 is 3409 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5500
- Performs up to 24% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610T - 140 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $83.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T | vs | Ryzen 5 5500 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |