Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Celeron G1610T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 62% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G1610T - 262 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 28 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
262
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$273.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7408 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610T | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |