Skip to main content
CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

The Celeron G1610 is slower than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

  • Up to 21% faster on average across 100+ games
  • Is 12 years and 10 months newer
  • Available for $4099

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX ranks 50 points higher.

Coreshelp

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX has 30 more cores.

Threadshelp

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX has 62 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX has 126 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX has a 54% higher base clock.

TDPhelp

Celeron G1610 draws 295W less power.

LGA1155
Sockethelp
sTR5
Ivy Bridge
Codenamehelp
Shimada Peak
Desktop
Segmenthelp
Server/Workstation
Intel HD
Integrated GPUhelp
No Integrated Graphics
DDR3
RAMhelp
6400 MHz (DDR5)
Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Celeron G1610 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX?expand_more
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. It's 106% faster than the Celeron G1610 on average across 100+ games, scoring 97/100 vs 47/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX than Celeron G1610?expand_more
106% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Celeron G1610 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX?expand_more
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 97/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Celeron G1610 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX?expand_more
Performance: Celeron G1610 scores 47/100, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX scores 97/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Celeron G1610 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Celeron G1610 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX?expand_more
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the stronger pick at 97/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Popular Comparisons

Why Is My PC Slow?

Join thousands of gamers already benchmarking their rigs.

Download HowManyFPS

Windows 10/11, under 50 MB, always free

Spot BottlenecksBoost FPS100+ Games