Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $37.00 vs $744.99
- Up to 93% better value when playing Watch Dogs: Legion than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.30 vs $4.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 37% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G1610 - 170 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
Buy for $744.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |