Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $37.00 vs $495.36
- Up to 92% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.27 vs $3.20 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 55 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1610 - 155 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7304 minutes ago
Buy for $495.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7304 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |