In Atomfall, the Celeron G1610 is slower than the Ryzen 7 7435HS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1610
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 7435HS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 222 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
185 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
84%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 7435HS
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | FP7 |
| 55W | Power Consumption | 45W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
