Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2894 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - $37.00 vs $179.00
- Up to 75% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 5800X - $0.10 vs $0.40 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1610 - 452 vs 369 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |