In Rust, the Celeron G1610 is same performance as the FX-8300. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $57 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Is 1 month and 10 days newer – Dec 03, 2012 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 1 month and 10 days newer
- Up to 54% cheaper – $49.00 vs $106.06
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Rust – $0.23 vs $0.50/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
FX-8300
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
98%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
46%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM3+ |
55W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
