Skip to main content
CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Celeron G1610 vs FX-6100

The Celeron G1610 is slightly faster than the FX-6100 on average across 100+ games and it's also a better value for money, as it's $9.26 cheaper!

  • Up to 2% faster on average across 100+ games
  • Is 1 year and 2 months newer

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Celeron G1610 ranks 2 points higher.

Coreshelp

FX-6100 has 4 more cores.

Threadshelp

FX-6100 has 4 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

FX-6100 has 6 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp
AMD FX-6100 Logo
FX-6100
3.3 GHz

FX-6100 has a 27% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp
AMD FX-6100 Logo
FX-6100
3.9 GHz
TDPhelp

Celeron G1610 draws 40W less power.

Pricehelp
AMD FX-6100 Logo
FX-6100
$33.90

Celeron G1610 is $9.26 cheaper.

LGA1155
Sockethelp
AM3+
Ivy Bridge
Codenamehelp
Zambezi
Desktop
Segmenthelp
Desktop
Intel HD
Integrated GPUhelp
No Integrated Graphics
DDR3
RAMhelp
DDR3
Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Celeron G1610 or FX-6100?expand_more
The Celeron G1610. It's 4% faster than the FX-6100 on average across 100+ games, scoring 48/100 vs 46/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Celeron G1610 than FX-6100?expand_more
4% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Celeron G1610 or FX-6100?expand_more
The Celeron G1610 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Celeron G1610 worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 48/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Celeron G1610 and FX-6100?expand_more
Performance: Celeron G1610 scores 48/100, FX-6100 scores 46/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Celeron G1610 or FX-6100 bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Celeron G1610 or FX-6100?expand_more
The Celeron G1610 is the stronger pick at 48/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Popular Comparisons

Why Is My PC Slow?

Join thousands of gamers already benchmarking their rigs.

Download HowManyFPS

Windows 10/11, under 50 MB, always free

Spot BottlenecksBoost FPS100+ Games