Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 9 288V
The Celeron G1610 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 288V on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FPS Comparison Across Popular Games
Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.
Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.
Base Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 288V has a 27% higher base clock.
LGA1155
Sockethelp
Intel BGA 2833Ivy Bridge
Codenamehelp
Lunar LakeDesktop
Segmenthelp
MobileIntel HD
Integrated GPUhelp
Arc Graphics Lunar LakeDDR3
RAMhelp
8533 MHz (LPDDR5X)Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Not OverclockableFrequently Asked Questions
compare_arrowsWhich is better, Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 9 288V?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 288V. It's 57% faster than the Celeron G1610 on average across 100+ games, scoring 30/100 vs 47/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 288V than Celeron G1610?expand_more
57% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 9 288V?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 288V is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 9 288V worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 30/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Celeron G1610 and Core Ultra 9 288V?expand_more
Performance: Celeron G1610 scores 47/100, Core Ultra 9 288V scores 30/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 9 288V bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 9 288V?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 288V is the stronger pick at 30/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.
Popular Comparisons
Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DCeleron G1610 vs Ryzen 5 7600XCeleron G1610 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3DCeleron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 7700XCeleron G1610 vs Ryzen 9 9900XCeleron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DCeleron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 9700XCeleron G1610 vs Ryzen 5 8500GCeleron G1610 vs Ultra 7 265KFCeleron G1610 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3DCeleron G1610 vs i3-12100FCeleron G1610 vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DAthlon II X2 240 vs Celeron G1610Celeron G1610 vs Ryzen 7 9800X3DCeleron G1610 vs Pentium E5400Celeron G1610 vs Ultra 5 245KCeleron G1610 vs Ultra 5 245KFUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 5 7600XUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 9 9950X3DUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 7 7700XUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 9 9900XUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 7 9700XUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 5 8500GUltra 7 265KF vs Ultra 9 288VUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 9 9900X3Di3-12100F vs Ultra 9 288VUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DAthlon II X2 240 vs Ultra 9 288VUltra 9 288V vs Ryzen 7 9800X3DUltra 9 288V vs Pentium E5400Ultra 5 245K vs Ultra 9 288VUltra 5 245KF vs Ultra 9 288V