In The Last of Us Part I, the Celeron G1610 is faster than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1610
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 243 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 10 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
