In Atomfall, the Celeron G1610 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $239 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Up to 83% cheaper – $49.00 vs $288.00
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall – $0.26 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
76%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
