Skip to main content
CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Celeron G1610 vs Core Ultra 7 165H

The Celeron G1610 is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 7 165H on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

  • Up to 3% faster on average across 100+ games
  • Is 11 years and 2 months newer
  • Available for $460

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Celeron G1610 ranks 38 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core Ultra 7 165H has 14 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core Ultra 7 165H has 20 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core Ultra 7 165H has 22 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core Ultra 7 165H has a 46% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp
TDPhelp

Core Ultra 7 165H draws 27W less power.

LGA1155
Sockethelp
Intel BGA 2049
Ivy Bridge
Codenamehelp
Meteor Lake
Desktop
Segmenthelp
Mobile
Intel HD
Integrated GPUhelp
Arc Graphics
DDR3
RAMhelp
5600 MHz (DDR5 Depends on motherboard)
Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 7 165H?expand_more
The Celeron G1610. It's 380% faster than the Core Ultra 7 165H on average across 100+ games, scoring 48/100 vs 10/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Celeron G1610 than Core Ultra 7 165H?expand_more
380% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 7 165H?expand_more
The Celeron G1610 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Celeron G1610 worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 48/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Celeron G1610 and Core Ultra 7 165H?expand_more
Performance: Celeron G1610 scores 48/100, Core Ultra 7 165H scores 10/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 7 165H bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Celeron G1610 or Core Ultra 7 165H?expand_more
The Celeron G1610 is the stronger pick at 48/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Popular Comparisons

Why Is My PC Slow?

Join thousands of gamers already benchmarking their rigs.

Download HowManyFPS

Windows 10/11, under 50 MB, always free

Spot BottlenecksBoost FPS100+ Games