Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $37.00 vs $426.84
- Up to 90% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-14900K - $0.15 vs $1.48 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G1610 - 289 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
10%
Price, $
$426.84
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $426.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 291 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |