In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron G1610 is faster than the Core i9-12900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $240 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 83% cheaper – $49.00 vs $289.07
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.24 vs $1.71/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Is 8 years and 11 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
169 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$289.07
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
