In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron G1610 is faster than the Core i7-14700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1610
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 208 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700KF
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-14700KF: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-14700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-14700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
