Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $37.00 vs $310.00
- Up to 86% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-13700K - $0.22 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1610 - 196 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7304 minutes ago
Buy for $310 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7305 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |