In Rust, the Celeron G1610 is slower than the Core i7-12700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $196 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Up to 80% cheaper – $49.00 vs $244.99
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Rust – $0.23 vs $0.94/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-12700F
- Up to 23% faster in Rust – 258 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-12700F: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
52%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
258 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
77 FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.99
20%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
24%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-12700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i7-12700F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $324.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
