In GRID, the Celeron G1610 is same performance as the Core i5-12400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12400F
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
GRID FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
11%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $174.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
