In GRID, the Celeron G1610 is same performance as the Core i3-14100. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $90 cheaper!
Celeron G1610
- Up to 65% cheaper – $49.00 vs $138.54
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 64% better value in GRID – $0.10 vs $0.28/FPS
- Up to 64% better value in GRID
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 55 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
GRID FPS Calculator
Celeron G1610 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.54
35%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
36%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1610 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
