Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3412 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 40% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron B830 - 208 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $133.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B830 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |