In Atomfall, the Celeron B820 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3440. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Jul 01, 2012 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3440
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Xeon X3440: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Xeon X3440 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Xeon X3440 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3440
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3440 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $215.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1156 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
