In Starfield, the Celeron B820 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5540. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield – 92 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Starfield
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Jul 01, 2012 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5540
No clear advantages
Starfield FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Xeon E5540: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Xeon E5540 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Xeon E5540 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5540
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5540 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $774.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
