In Dead Space, the Celeron B820 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 175 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Jul 01, 2012 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5530
No clear advantages
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Xeon E5530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Xeon E5530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Xeon E5530 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5530
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5530 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $530.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
