In Control, the Celeron B820 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 35 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 248 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | SP3r2 |
35W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
