In Atomfall, the Celeron B820 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Up to 35% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$314
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
3%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
36%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM5 |
35W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
