In Control, the Celeron B820 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 5900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 251 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Jan 12, 2021 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 9 5900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 9 5900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 9 5900 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
3%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5900
Jan 12th, 2021
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900 Jan 12th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
