In Deathloop, the Celeron B820 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 7435HS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 7435HS
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 7435HS
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | FP7 |
35W | Power Consumption | 45W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
