In Atomfall, the Celeron B820 is slower than the Ryzen 7 5700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5700
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 224 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 9 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 7 5700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 7 5700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 7 5700 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $179.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
