In Deathloop, the Celeron B820 is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i9-13900
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Core i9-13900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
