In Rust, the Celeron B820 is slightly slower than the Core i7-6700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-6700
- Up to 7% faster in Rust – 223 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Jul 01, 2015 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Core i7-6700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Core i7-6700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Core i7-6700 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700 Jul 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1151 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
