In Rust, the Celeron B820 is slightly slower than the Core i7-3930K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Is 7 months and 16 days newer – Jul 01, 2012 vs Nov 14, 2011
- Is 7 months and 16 days newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-3930K
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 210 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Core i7-3930K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Core i7-3930K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Core i7-3930K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3930K Nov 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | $583.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2011 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
