In Control, the Celeron B820 is slightly slower than the Core i7-3820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Is 4 months and 17 days newer – Jul 01, 2012 vs Feb 13, 2012
- Is 4 months and 17 days newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-3820
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 246 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Core i7-3820: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$349.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Core i7-3820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Core i7-3820 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
20%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3820 Feb 13th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $305.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2011 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
