In Deathloop, the Celeron B820 is slightly faster than the Core i7-3770K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 months and 2 days newer – Jul 01, 2012 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 2 months and 2 days newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Core i7-3770K
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Core i7-3770K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
219 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
96%
Price, $
$209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Core i7-3770K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Core i7-3770K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770K Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $313.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1155 |
35W | Power Consumption | 77W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
