In Atomfall, the Celeron B820 is slower than the Core i5-12490F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12490F
- Up to 27% faster in Atomfall – 229 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron B820 vs Core i5-12490F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron B820 vs Core i5-12490F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron B820 vs Core i5-12490F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12490F
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
