Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4390 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron B815 - 197 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$331.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $331.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |