The Celeron 887 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 7950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 887
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 17 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 7950X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 2 threads
Celeron 887 vs Ryzen 9 7950X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Average FPS
163
74%
Min 1% FPS
110
76%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
145
100%
Price, $
$480.4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
100%
Celeron 887 vs Ryzen 9 7950X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 887 vs Ryzen 9 7950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 887 vs Ryzen 9 7950X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
3%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
33%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7950X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 887 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $699.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
17 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.7 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR5 @ 5200 MHz |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
