The Celeron 887 is a much slower gaming CPU than the FX-8320E. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 887
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron 887 vs FX-8320E for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Average FPS
163
98%
Min 1% FPS
110
98%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
167
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Celeron 887 vs FX-8320E in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 887 vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 887 vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 887 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320E |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $147.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
17 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
