The Celeron 887 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 887
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-10700K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Celeron 887 vs Core i7-10700K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Average FPS
163
85%
Min 1% FPS
110
87%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$299.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Celeron 887 vs Core i7-10700K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 887 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 887 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
39%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 887 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
