The Celeron 887 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 887
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-10100
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron 887 vs Core i3-10100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Average FPS
163
88%
Min 1% FPS
110
89%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
$91.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Celeron 887 vs Core i3-10100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 887 vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 887 vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 887
Sep 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
42%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 887 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
17 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
