In Atomfall, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jun 19, 2011 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1156 |
17W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
