In Rust, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 17 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 16% faster in Rust – 241 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2499.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
3%
L3 Cache
2 MB
1%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 7th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $3,990.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | TRX4 |
17W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
