In Minecraft, the Celeron 847 is same performance as the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 17 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
1076 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
230 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
31%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | SP3r2 |
17W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
