In Minecraft, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 91% less energy – 17 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 91% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 1% faster in Minecraft – 1072 vs 1066 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Minecraft
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
1072 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
224 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
29%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | SP3r2 |
17W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
