In Rust, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the FX-8370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
FX-8370
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 210 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
100%
Price, $
$252.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
28%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM3+ |
17W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
