In Minecraft, the Celeron 847 is slightly faster than the FX-8320E. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Up to 1% faster in Minecraft – 1065 vs 1058 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Minecraft
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
FX-8320E
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs FX-8320E: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
1058 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs FX-8320E in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs FX-8320E in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
34%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $147.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AM3+ |
17W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
