In Deathloop, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 13 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
2 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
26%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $294.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1851 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
