In Rust, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Core i7-7820X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 17 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-7820X
- Up to 10% faster in Rust – 229 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 7 days newer – Jun 26, 2017 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 6 years and 7 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Core i7-7820X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$349.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Core i7-7820X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Core i7-7820X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
18%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
31%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
11 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7820X Jun 26th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA2066 |
17W | Power Consumption | 140W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
